(SS)

Without going into details of the Amnesty International report on human rights violations, arrest and torture operations by the Sudanese authorities against opposition figures and human rights activists, the question is; Does the Amnesty International write a comprehensive report on human rights violations in various parts of the world in an equal manner?.

If the answer is yes, we expect to read reports on humanitarian tragedies in Gaza, the occupied Palestine territories, the atrocities of the US secret prisons besides the practices of NATO and US soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

If the Amnesty International wants to gain the respect of the world, it shall deal with the entire human rights issues in an equal manner. It is well known that the selectivity method of the Amnesty International toward the human rights issues in the world is an additional evidence that the organization is biased.

Surely, the organization tried to seize the opportunity of the issuance of the ICC indictment list against President Al-Bashir and issued its report on human rights violations in order to support the charges.

The report of the Amnesty International is full of repeated and nonsense phrases like" using brutal campaign of torture, and "arrests against human rights activists".

What concerns us in this regard is that the organization did not make any balance when took testimonies from individuals about the alleged human rights violations.

The accusations against Sudanese government were based only on hearsay testimonies not concrete facts. This method is no longer useful and acceptable.